Heaving Bosoms & Rigid Fiddlesticks
- By Tracy Ames
- Published September 3, 2010
Tracy Ames
Mrs. Ames is an international bestselling author of interracial erotic fiction and a former columnist for several newsletters and magazines.
A native of the San Francisco Bay Area, Tracy currently split time between CT & New York City with her husband, children and a host of pets.
*NEWER* Leather & Lace Tumblr(NSFW)
*NEW* RR&R Tumblr (Safe)
Youtube
Facebook
Myspace
I’m beginning to think my true calling in life was that of the consummate antagonist because my keen ability to piss people off is unrivaled. Yesterday, two fellow authors and I sat on a panel discussing the evolution of standard prose & genre definition.
To be honest, I’m rather sick of these conversations. With the publishing houses and editors casting their lot on the side of modernity, we can all agree that the unyielding rules of style and genre categorization are being rewritten. The days of black and white lit are gone; in its place we have gray areas: Romanica, polylit, docudrama.
Not only have readers embraced these new genres, we created them. I say we because most modern writers are nothing more than refugees from the Harlequin camp who struck out on our own after reading one too many tales of heaving bosoms and rigid fiddlesticks.
“Cocks have no place in romance.”
I don’t know about that. True, one shouldn’t employ graphic language to create a scene; it should be used to punctuate the setting as I’ve written here and here. Cocks will remain in my writing. But the level to which the bluestockings are prepared to go to bar any form of naughtiness from impregnating their genre pretty much epitomizes their staunch commitment to present sex completely stripped of any pleasure.
And don’t get me started on humor!
One of the panelists mentioned reading “Hers For The Taking” and found the humor 'light'. Humor, it turns out, has no place in romance and erotica. Bitch, it wasn’t like there were juggling circus clowns! And yes, I told her as much (there’s where the pissing off bit came in). I’m a cheeky smartass with a hankering for the absurd, and I have a sneaky suspicion my readers are the same way.
A story should combine a little of everything: Humor, love, tragedy, and sexytime. No one wants to read entire stories about characters taking long rain soaked walks on the moor, dreaming of unrequited love. Even to the most untrained of eyes, that story would suck!
So, there you go. I pissed off my fellow panelist. This to, she shall overcome.
Yesterday, Eva sent me this picture. I love that gal!

To be honest, I’m rather sick of these conversations. With the publishing houses and editors casting their lot on the side of modernity, we can all agree that the unyielding rules of style and genre categorization are being rewritten. The days of black and white lit are gone; in its place we have gray areas: Romanica, polylit, docudrama.
Not only have readers embraced these new genres, we created them. I say we because most modern writers are nothing more than refugees from the Harlequin camp who struck out on our own after reading one too many tales of heaving bosoms and rigid fiddlesticks.
“Cocks have no place in romance.”
I don’t know about that. True, one shouldn’t employ graphic language to create a scene; it should be used to punctuate the setting as I’ve written here and here. Cocks will remain in my writing. But the level to which the bluestockings are prepared to go to bar any form of naughtiness from impregnating their genre pretty much epitomizes their staunch commitment to present sex completely stripped of any pleasure.
And don’t get me started on humor!
One of the panelists mentioned reading “Hers For The Taking” and found the humor 'light'. Humor, it turns out, has no place in romance and erotica. Bitch, it wasn’t like there were juggling circus clowns! And yes, I told her as much (there’s where the pissing off bit came in). I’m a cheeky smartass with a hankering for the absurd, and I have a sneaky suspicion my readers are the same way.
A story should combine a little of everything: Humor, love, tragedy, and sexytime. No one wants to read entire stories about characters taking long rain soaked walks on the moor, dreaming of unrequited love. Even to the most untrained of eyes, that story would suck!
So, there you go. I pissed off my fellow panelist. This to, she shall overcome.
Yesterday, Eva sent me this picture. I love that gal!

Spread The Word
4 Responses to "Heaving Bosoms & Rigid Fiddlesticks" 
|
said this on 03 Sep 2010 10:28:53 PM CST
Tracy,
Someday I will tell you a marvelous story about my run ins with the "red and purple" Harlequin cults and my very mild attempts to annoy a small pissy group of warring blue haired ladies. You will fit to bust. |
|
said this on 04 Sep 2010 7:37:17 PM CST
Oh please do! I love a good laugh. :)
|
|
said this on 04 Sep 2010 2:00:06 AM CST
Oh I love it. I wish people would realize that, yes, people are reading and writing outside the box. Sorry too late.
I cannot say how many smart alecky matches with non-wit nitwits about this subject I have had. Had a good one over at Amazon playing partners in crime with another author, oh that was some kind of fun and plenty hilarious. I've hurt some feelings but so what, if you don't like the heat get out the dang bedroom. I like the classics in romance but I like to mix it up a bit, I get bored easily. And what the hell is romance with a few cocks thrown in. |
|
said this on 04 Sep 2010 7:35:27 PM CST
Eugenia, I bet you gave them hell! There's nothing wrong with the classics, but the bluestockings who demand newbies confirm to their rules are setting themselves up for a literary ass kicking. It's a textbook example of supply and demand. If the readers didn't demand it, the writers/publishers wouldn't supply it.
Humor isn't new....these folks need to lighten up |
Author/Admin)